Abeokuta, Ogun State – In a latest improvement on the governorship election petition tribunal in Abeokuta, a vital objection raised by counsel to the Peoples Democratic Social gathering (PDP), Gordy Uche, SAN, has been dismissed. The objection insisted that the petitioner’s witness shouldn’t be requested to check witness statements with statements made by different petitioners. In the meantime, the trial witnessed yet one more twist when the PDP’s counsel was requested to step down the looks of a subpoenaed witness.
Through the tribunal session, Dr Remi Olatubora, counsel to the first respondent (INEC), cross-examined a witness referred to as by the PDP, Hon. Aina Adewale, from Sagamu. Olatubora identified placing similarities between Adewale’s witness assertion and people of two different witnesses, Sowande Seun and Ademola Adekunle. The similarities had been so pronounced that they prolonged to word-for-word and omission-for-omission situations. Because of this, Olatubora argued that it was important to query the witness extensively to confirm his credibility and accuracy.
Additionally learn: Wizkid Expresses Confidence In His Musical Legacy And Teases Sixth Studio Album
Nevertheless, in response to the objection, the PDP’s counsel cited part 67 of the proof act, emphasizing that the witness shouldn’t be questioned about paperwork he didn’t creator. He additionally referred to different authorized authorities to assist his argument.
Dismissing the objection, Olatubora invoked part 223 of the proof act and underscored its accordance with the 1999 structure, which ensures a good listening to. He asserted that the act permits him to cross-examine the witness in any method that checks his veracity and information. Moreover, Governor Abiodun’s lawyer, Professor Taiwo Osipitan SAN, careworn that one of many functions of cross-examination is to find who a witness really is. Osipitan argued that asking the witness to check his assertion with the statements of different witnesses is permissible because it supplies a possibility for clarification and helps decide if the witness is credible.
The counsel to the All Progressives Congress (APC), Otunba Kunle Kalejaiye, supported the arguments of his colleagues, stating that the PDP’s lawyer didn’t exhibit that the questions posed to the witness had been scandalous, conceited, offensive, or in any means prohibited by legislation. He joined the opposite attorneys in urging the tribunal to overrule the objection.
Additionally learn: Ebuka Obi-Uchendu Opens Up About Fame And Its Impression On His Profession
Consequently, the tribunal dominated in opposition to the objection raised by the PDP’s counsel, citing its earlier selections on related objections.
In one other important improvement, the PDP’s counsel was requested to step down the looks of a subpoenaed witness who claimed to be an INEC employees and labored as a presiding officer throughout the March 18th governorship ballot. This choice got here after objections had been raised by counsels to INEC concerning the timing of the witness’s assertion, which was solely made and served on the respondents yesterday.
The trial will proceed in Abeokuta, because the tribunal explores the intricacies surrounding the governorship election and seeks to ship a good judgment.